Showing posts with label conspiracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conspiracy. Show all posts

Back in the ИSSR


Trouble in pranksta's paradise, as the ‘movement’ continues its melodramatic pow-wow for power. From comments on the bloap opera:
[RSU blogger]: "Let us celebrate our significant victory and join in building a student movement capable of being a catalyst for the type of change that our society needs. Education, protests, occupations, and strikes – we must do whatever we can to build a movement and take back our university."

[integrated]: Build the PARTY! I mean, movement! Yes, towards the consolidation of power into the MOVEMENT! Anything for the MOVEMENT! only the MOVEMENT can act! All praise the glorious MOVEMENT!

You don't need to lie to get things done. Movements, in the way you know them, are dead; future struggles will grind their gravestones into rocks for the insurrections to come.

Apparently, there is a rift between the Radical Student Union and the professional protesters who actually planned and guided this occupation, with the former scrambling to be relevant and to gather the sloppy seconds of vainglorious spin.

Share/Save/Bookmark

My Predictions for 2009

I predict not one, but two, neologisms will be invented when Climate Change proves woefully idiotic (following Global Warming). Both revisions will scurry to incorporate the striking stability discovered in overall climate, as "more incontrovertible proof" of man's disastrous effect on our environment. Al Gore will continue to personally rake in a percentage of all CO² taxes, and his PR firm will acquire Discovery Channel, claiming a mandate to "save it from corporate corruption."

al_gore_guitar
Image by openDemocracy via Flickr

Anti-WTO and Greenpeace protesters will ramp up their offensives globally, shrieking that the "fascist libertarian" Obama "isn't doing enough" to keep other cultures shielded from the economic development that corrupts the capitalist West. They will increasingly adopt the tactics of terrorism, until at the end of the year their plan to blow up a nuclear power plant in upstate NY is foiled by internal disputes over the fate of the surrounding flora and fauna.

A cure for AIDS will not be found, but cutting-edge evolutionary medicine will perfect a cure for allergies based, strangely enough, on homeopathic principles. Breast cancer will be curbed dramatically by innovative detection techniques, while the ensuing vacuum of a reason to walk/run will force obesity to rise among women aged 17-35. They will be forced into poverty by new, local obesity taxes.

The theory of evolution itself will enjoy a vastly resurgent acceptance, and "America's Fittest Family" will become the #1 prime-time reality game show. In academia, critical theorists and policy makers will hope that this is their chance to push through "Eugenics, Version 2.0"

Michael Jackson will make a bizarre and brief comeback with a hit song with cryptic lyrics about "belugas closing their stuffed hands around Sri Lanka." His sole televised performance will occur aboard Virgin Galactic, where he will appear in blackface with an audience of various toddler-sized dolls. As his zero-gravity encore, he will strap 400 lbs. of explosives to his crotch and sniffle something vaguely to the effect of "this planet wasn't meant for all my beauteous starry love."

The Russian military, facing the public relations nightmare of failing to annex an unfortified Crimea and Azerbaijan, will turn against Putin and install a temporary military regime until transitioning toward real democracy, led by its newly elected Siberian minority leader.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Kwanzaa: violent 60s radical invented fake holiday

Ron Karenga celebrating Kwanzaa at the Rochest...Image via Wikipedia

Link: examiner.com

Held each year from December 26 until January 2, Kwanzaa is increasingly seen as an appropriate multicultural alternative to Christmas, a holiday considered too religious and “Eurocentric” for public schools.

But there is one not-so-insignificant problem with Kwanzaa. While many teachers believe it is an ancient African harvest festival, it was not born in pre-colonial West Africa, but in 1960s southern California. It is the brainchild of African-American radical activist, academic and convicted felon Ron Karenga.

In 1969, two rival radical groups were battling for control of the UCLA black studies program: the Black Panthers and the lesser-known US, or United Slaves, led by Mr. Karenga. Both groups sauntered around campus carrying loaded guns. Perhaps inevitably, violence erupted. As
David Horowitz recalls in Radical Son, Black Panther John Higginswas “murdered—along with Al ‘Bunchy’ Carter—on the UCLA campus by members of Ron Karenga’s organization.” After the killing, the FBI infiltrated both groups, and the United Slaves turned to fighting “enemies within.”

The result:
two female members were tortured by their “comrades” in May, 1970. Both alledge Mr. Karenga ordered and participated in their assaults.

In 1999, writer
Paul Mulshine published his research into Karenga’s violent past onFrontPageMagazine. Mr. Mulshine found a May 14, 1971, Los Angeles Timesreport of the victims’ testimony, which read:

“The victims said they were living at Karenga’s home when Karenga accused them of trying to [poison] him. . . . When they denied it, allegedly they were beaten with an electrical cord and a hot soldering iron was put in [one victim’s] mouth and against her face. Police were told that one of [the other victim’s] toes was placed in a small vise which was allegedly tightened by one of the defendants. The following day . . . Karenga, holding a gun, threatened to shoot both of them.”

Convicted of felonious assault and false imprisonment, Mr. Karenga was sentenced in 1971 to up to 10 years in prison. “A brief account of the sentencing ran in several newspapers the following day,” Mr. Mulshine writes. “That was apparently the last newspaper article to mention Karenga’s unfortunate habit of doing unspeakable things to black people. After that, the only coverage came from the hundreds of news accounts that depict him as the wonderful man who invented Kwanzaa.”

Shortly after his release from prison in 1975, Mr. Karenga (now armed, not with a pistol, but a doctorate)
took over the black studies department at California State University, Long Beach, which he runs to this day.

And what about Kwanzaa?

The festival’s seven days commemorate allegedly “traditional African” principles, such as “collective work” and “cooperative economics,” each referred to by a Swahili name.

“Why did Karenga use Swahili words for his fictional African feast?” asks Mr. Mulshine. “American Blacks are primarily descended from people who came from Ghana and other parts of West Africa. Kenya and Tanzania—where Swahili is spoken—are thousands of miles away.
This makes about as much sense as having Irish-Americans celebrate St. Patrick’s Day by speaking Polish.”

And why would Mr. Karenga schedule a harvest festival near the winter solstice, “a season when few fruits or vegetables are harvested anywhere?”

The religious satire magazine
The Door likewise questioned Kwanzaa’s authenticity. “Karenga cobbled together a mishmash of different traditions and languages and blended them with Marxist ideas to reflect a unified African culture that doesn’t exist anywhere,” it reported. Ujamaa, or “cooperative economics”—one of the seven principles of Kwanzaa—is the term the socialist leader of Tanzania, Julius Nyerere, used for his disastrous policy of putting tens of thousands of Tanzanians on collective farms.

People think it’s African, but it’s not,” admitted Karenga in a 1978 Washington Post interview. “I put it around Christmas because I knew that’s when a lot of ‘bloods’ [Blacks] would be partying.”


Share/Save/Bookmark

Are we correct that all cultural values are being destroyed?

Are we correct that all cultural values are being destroyed? Or are they once again changing, under the press of circumstance and from their own internal dynamics, while we, the anthropologists, disapprove of the changes or at least do not comprehend them?

“To argue globally against cultural change is a startling position; to accept all change as good is mindless and cruel. The challenge, as yet unmet, is to conceptualize communities as a complex process of stability and change, and then to factor in the changes tourism brings. To this end, the evaluation of tourism cannot be accomplished by measuring the impact of tourism against a static background. Some of what we see as destruction is construction. Some is the result of a lack of any other viable option; and some the result of choices that could be made differently.

“Which is which is by no means an easy matter to decide, but is clear that anthropologists have not yet met these problems head on.”

–Davyd J. Greenwood
from Valene Smith’s
Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism (1977)


Share/Save/Bookmark