Showing posts with label environ-mental. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environ-mental. Show all posts

A feel-good fridge-free farce

from Annals of self-loathing at PotterundefinedGold:
Apparently the latest thing in low-impact living is getting rid of your fridge. The NYTimes naturally has the details, though the featured performers are, improbably, a couple of public servants in Ottawa City, Canada:

FOR the last two years, Rachel Muston, a 32-year-old information-technology worker for the Canadian government in Ottawa, has been taking steps to reduce her carbon footprint — composting, line-drying clothes, installing an efficient furnace in her three-story house downtown.
About a year ago, though, she decided to “go big” in her effort to be more environmentally responsible, she said. After mulling the idea over for several weeks, she and her husband, Scott Young, did something many would find unthinkable: they unplugged their refrigerator.
Not everyone is sold on the idea:
Deanna Duke, who lives in Seattle and runs the site Ms. Willis visited, said that taking a stand for or against unplugging has become “a badge of honor” for those on either side. “It’s either ‘look how far I’m willing to go,’ or ‘look how far I’m not willing to go,’ ” she said. For her part, Ms. Duke may refrain from watering her lawn in an effort at conservation, but she’s firmly in the pro-refrigerator camp. “I can’t think of any circumstances, other than an involuntary extreme situation, that would make me unplug my fridge,” she said. “The convenience factor is too high.”

Share/Save/Bookmark

My Predictions for 2009

I predict not one, but two, neologisms will be invented when Climate Change proves woefully idiotic (following Global Warming). Both revisions will scurry to incorporate the striking stability discovered in overall climate, as "more incontrovertible proof" of man's disastrous effect on our environment. Al Gore will continue to personally rake in a percentage of all CO² taxes, and his PR firm will acquire Discovery Channel, claiming a mandate to "save it from corporate corruption."

al_gore_guitar
Image by openDemocracy via Flickr

Anti-WTO and Greenpeace protesters will ramp up their offensives globally, shrieking that the "fascist libertarian" Obama "isn't doing enough" to keep other cultures shielded from the economic development that corrupts the capitalist West. They will increasingly adopt the tactics of terrorism, until at the end of the year their plan to blow up a nuclear power plant in upstate NY is foiled by internal disputes over the fate of the surrounding flora and fauna.

A cure for AIDS will not be found, but cutting-edge evolutionary medicine will perfect a cure for allergies based, strangely enough, on homeopathic principles. Breast cancer will be curbed dramatically by innovative detection techniques, while the ensuing vacuum of a reason to walk/run will force obesity to rise among women aged 17-35. They will be forced into poverty by new, local obesity taxes.

The theory of evolution itself will enjoy a vastly resurgent acceptance, and "America's Fittest Family" will become the #1 prime-time reality game show. In academia, critical theorists and policy makers will hope that this is their chance to push through "Eugenics, Version 2.0"

Michael Jackson will make a bizarre and brief comeback with a hit song with cryptic lyrics about "belugas closing their stuffed hands around Sri Lanka." His sole televised performance will occur aboard Virgin Galactic, where he will appear in blackface with an audience of various toddler-sized dolls. As his zero-gravity encore, he will strap 400 lbs. of explosives to his crotch and sniffle something vaguely to the effect of "this planet wasn't meant for all my beauteous starry love."

The Russian military, facing the public relations nightmare of failing to annex an unfortified Crimea and Azerbaijan, will turn against Putin and install a temporary military regime until transitioning toward real democracy, led by its newly elected Siberian minority leader.

Share/Save/Bookmark

The Plastic Lobster

Is there any end to how ridiculous this animal rights/health food spectacle will get? Whole Foods Market, the four billion-dollar-a-year corporation that pretends it's a neighborhood grocer, has recently banned live lobster sales. In a statement released June 16th, they claim:

plastic lobster

"Although we discovered significant improvements are possible from capture up to in-store tank conditions, we are not yet sufficiently satisfied that the process of selling live lobsters is in line with our commitment to humane treatment and quality of life for animals."

Apparently, the upscale supermarket chain did some extensive testing to make sure that lobsters were comfortable living in a small tank with 20 of their closest friends and rubber bands around their claws. I don't know if they surveyed the crustaceans or what, but it turns out that what really make them red with anger is that they can't breathe too well sitting for months in, effectvely, puddles of their own excrement.

What I'd like to know, is who in their right mind gives a shit about oversized marine bugs? What, it's okay to boil the suckers alive, but putting them in cramped spaces is crossing the line? I smelled something fishy, and it sure wasn't lobster poop.

A much more believable reason, I think, is that profit margins are negligible for a low-turnover, high-maintenance product like live lobsters. Keeping those things alive costs more way more than just stocking the frozen meat, which by the way Whole Foods still does. But of course, profit margins are not a dignified enough reason for the yippie demographic, whose priviledged pseudo-communist sensibilities usually find all this talk of profits exceedingly distasteful. So Whole Foods went on a staged "fact-finding mission" to expose the dirty underbelly of lobster trafficking. Call it euphemistic muckraking. I call it a steaming pile of buoyant lobster shit.

Nevermind that lobsters don't have central nervous systems, or brains bigger than the size of a pea, or that a Norwegian study recently demonstrated that lobsters cannot experience pain. This has nothing to do with actual study, and everything to do with making symbolic gestures toward placating PETA, who run a lobster liberation website, among other pea-brained follies. So instead of looking like a big bad business, Whole Foods comes out looking like animal rights champions. Too bad it cares less and less about the rights of actual human beings.

I'll admit, I don't shop at Whole Foods, even though I am a vegetarian and love the taste of organic food. They charge more for their products than all but the upper-middle class can afford to spend, and their price-gouging is reprehensible considering the everyday low prices of Trader Joe's. But shopping at Whole Foods has never had anything to do with lofty ideals of social and environmental awareness. No, people shop at Whole Foods because they want to congratulate themselves for being such responsible consumers, buy into trendy activism, and perhaps atone for their middle-class guilt. It's the classic benevolent, kitschy trickle-down mindframe that fuels Whole Foods' fire.

And don't even get me started on PETA. Those hypocritical bastards can go suck on a lobster's claw, while it whimpers ever so softly, "Put me out of my misery."


Share/Save/Bookmark